Мова NL EN DE ES FR UK IT

Аналіз перебудови

Аналіз мереж

Чиста база для мережевого аналізу депутатів ЄП, документів і тем. Жодних жорстких політичних ярликів, лише перевірювані докази.

You are here

Minimum 10 % allocation for education in national plans and the RRF evaluation process.

You are viewing a dossier. From here you can see which actors, signals and linked vote events are visible around this document.

Jump to

Dossier Actors Sources and context Supporting layers Linked vote events

Dossier

Minimum 10 % allocation for education in national plans and the RRF evaluation process.

EP schriftelijke vraag met voorrang | - | source: parliamentary_questions

Open bronpagina Leesbare metadata Wikipedia zoeken

15Actors

0Signals

9EP term

Actors

Chiara Gemma

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Corina Crețu

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Cyrus Engerer

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Dan Nica

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Eugenia Rodríguez Palop

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Ismail Ertug

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Josianne Cutajar

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Juozas Olekas

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Miroslav Číž

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Monika Beňová

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Predrag Fred Matić

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Salima Yenbou

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Tatjana Ždanoka

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Victor Negrescu

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Viktor Uspaskich

Role: co-author

Method: name-normalized | confidence 0.7500

Sources and context Source text and aggregated content + Provenance and audit

Source text and aggregated content

Minimum 10 % allocation for education in national plans and the RRF evaluation process.

Provenance and audit

This block makes visible which source layer and datapoints the current view is based on.

Source layer parliamentary_questions

Canonical identifier P-9-2021-001660

Official source URL https://data.europarl.europa.eu/eli/dl/doc/P-9-2021-001660

Title and language layer English primary, Dutch fallback

EP term 9

News context around this event

Use these links to quickly search reputable news sources around the event date using the title and keywords.

Search period: -

Keywords: Minimum 10 % allocation for education in national plans and the RRF evaluation process

Reuters Financial Times Politico Europe The Guardian NRC de Volkskrant Google News

Supporting layers Signals

Signals

No signal clusters found for this topic yet.

Linked vote events Votes and seat distribution

Linked vote events

No official vote items linked to this dossier yet.

Next logical step

Use these routes to continue your research from this page.

Continue to topics Continue to evidence board Back to dashboard